A year, now, since Québec first crested the Big Orange Wave,
and still, the NDP continue to thrive. It prompts a brand-new big idea:
isn’t it time to build a provincial New Democratic Party in Québec?
There used to be one, though we’re forgiven to have forgotten. The
federal party prompted a divorce from its wayward disciple (and forced a
name change) years ago, as the provincial NDP-Q narrative became too
nationalistic, its friends too unsavoury, and its aims too divergent from the English Canadian federal party.
Those conditions have changed. The NDP is no longer an English
Canadian federal party. It’s a binational, bilingual, federal social
democratic party that proves it can appeal directly to, and draw
strength from, Quebecers. It’s the kind of party that many of us want
the country to effectively be. And so?
And so, it’s a fool’s errand, some will say. Once you fracture the
federalist vote between the provincial Liberals and a would-be
high-profile NDP-Q, you give the Parti Québécois all the room in the
world to dominate provincial politics for a generation and more. You
virtually guarantee another referendum, and that’s just irresponsible.
Maybe. But I think that oversimplifies the complexities of Québec’s
electoral landscape, and denies trends we’ve seen emerge in the
sovereigntist camp itself, which is evolving towards several discrete
left-right identities, manifest in distinct and new partisan agents. Can
federalists be so bold?
Québec fascinates through its multidimensionality. You aren’t trapped
within one of those false left-wing/right-wing 2D dichotomies, you’re
also forced to consider your sovereigntist/federalist position.
And your
place in one spectrum need not have any bearing on your place in the
other, creating all kinds of exotic creatures. Federalist socialists and
separatist neoliberals might seem rare specimens, but they aren’t –
they just don’t have their own parties.
This is changing, at least on the sovereigntists’ side. There are
evolutions in how they self-identify. Québec federalists continue to
organise as federalists, while the sovereigntists are beginning to
organise as leftists, or rightists, or safe centrists.
There’s no
longer a sovereigntist coalition – hence, we witness the CAQ over there
on your right, the PQ holding the fort left of centre, and QS on the
chaise longue with the Karl Marx teddy bear.
Just a theory, but this partisan diversity may have emerged precisely because
the Parti Quebecois stopped prioritising its sovereigntist identity,
and started prioritising its identity as a broadly left/centre-left
party.
Something that could strip social democratic federalist votes
away from the PLQ. It works – that happens. But the strategy will have
angered Péquistes who wanted sovereignty front and centre – and it’s
driven them to forge new parties, which can then only be organised and
differentiated along distinctive left/right lines.
That Québec federalists continue to huddle together in uncomfortable
left/right coalition might strike us as savvy and electorally
advantageous. But it doesn’t appear to be working at the mo.
The
apparent fracturing of the sovereigntist vote isn’t hurting the PQ’s
position – indeed, they are in safe majority territory. What can smart federalists do?
Play the Péquistes at their own game, and recognise that you can
fight for soft nationalists and soft federalists at once. That’s what
the Orange Wave was.
A provincial NDP could go to the student protests and say “We’re with
you. You don’t have to go to Québec Solidaire to voice dissent against
neoliberal policy, you can do it with us.” It could go to the provincial
Liberals and say “most of you are more progressive than you let on.
Come on, all you Mulcairs, come on in.” It could pull soft federalist
social democrats back from the PQ as well as pulling support from the
Liberals – something QS and CAQ aren’t in reach of doing.
Besides, the
very novelty of a provincial NDP could win it quick and early rewards
from a public that’s in a very up-for-anything, disestablishment-minded
mood. The trick, from there, is to hold such rewards – but the federal
NDP are doing it pretty impressively.
Coalitions such as the Parti liberal du Québec are sustainable
only insofar as there is a coherent opposite threat – look at the B.C.
Liberals!
That motley crew of Socreds, Tories and federal Liberals
sought nothing more complex out of life than to suppress the B.C. NDP.
But that coalition looks set to dissolve into incoherence, merely
because an upstart actual Conservative party has entered the provincial
scene.
B.C.’s Liberals are a mosaic made with cheap glue, and if social
democrats in Québec are bold enough, they’ll find that Charest’s
Liberals are in a similar condition.
His internal coalition could be
just as easily usurped by a challenger that is able to establish a
different kind of coalition – one that’s more coherent, and involves
Québec’s mass of federalist/soft nationalist social democrat orphans in a
meaningful way.
An NDP-Q would be risky, would ruffle feathers, and would rumble the status quo. Sounds like a goer. (X)
Liam Roberts is a Canadian writer, photographer and all-round
Renaissance Man based in Brixton, London. "Quebec's NDP Revolution"
appears on his blog, Polygonic.