Hundreds of characters buzz
through the Liberty Plaza, weaving through makeshift campsites of
tarps and sleeping bags, park tables, meetings, and circles of music or
chatting. There are arts and crafts, guitar groups, meditation circles, nap
time, and hang-outs.
At the back of the park, the
west end, a loud drum group beats the pulse of the movement, playing late into
the night. But stitched throughout the fun is serious hard work. All through
the day and into the night, working groups (and there are dozens) hold meetings
to carve out their responsibilities in the movement.
In the center of the park is the
media center, the nucleus of the whole operation, where tech-friendly activists
edit video, update the Web site, and manage social networking 24/7. A
generator's hum blends with the helicopters buzzing overhead.
Along with New York City, Occupy Wall
Street (Occupy Everything) demonstrations are now sweeping the nation, with
meetups in 1,383 cities. What the media once portrayed as either a lazy
hippie or anarchist blip in time has become an undeniable social movement with
long-term potential.
And as Occupy Wall St. gains steam and
supporters, the rich elites in control of our democracy have become defensive,
while others embrace the movement. Those who are afraid are doing their best to
delegitimize the movement, such as New York Times columnist
David Brooks, with his veiled smear of demonstrators focusing on a
seven-year-old article in Adbusters he described as
anti-Semitic. But as everyone knows, beyond encouragement in the magazine,
Adbusters has had almost nothing to do with OWS.
The most common criticisms of OWS, from
corporates and skeptics alike, are "I don't even know what they want"
or the allegation of disorganization. But demonstrators are not simply camping
out to ask the corporate government for legislation, they are creating the
change they desire; creating a democracy that is direct and representative of
all members of the 99 percent.
Occupy Wall St. is actually far more
organized than the mainstream media and critics may suggest. The lack of one
common goal is not disorganization, but freedom.
I've been on the ground at Occupy Wall
St.---sleeping, marching, getting arrested, and reporting almost daily,
and I can tell you that most of the media have the story all wrong. Here is
what's really happening.
People are living, and thriving, in the
space. Using donations, demonstrators have set up their own society, with
free books, food and (minimal) health care. When I slept there Sunday night, I
found I had almost everything I needed to survive.
There was plenty of food -- baked ziti,
fruit and cookies -- laid out in the buffet-style line. Between meals and late
at night, there is always something to munch on, usually healthy foods like
apples and bananas.
After I finished eating, my friends and
I searched for a place to set up camp. By 8pm, just finding an unoccupied spot
was difficult. When we finally posted up by the steps at Broadway, we grabbed a
bunch of cardboard signs and stacked them underneath a yoga mat and tarp, then
wandered off to socialize.
About 9pm, I got a text from an
organizer named Anthony saying "Wall St. and Broad. Now!" I hurried
over to find a sight much more peaceful than I expected.
About 10 people stood on the sidewalk
with their backs to a barrier, talking quietly as one man slept on the street-side
of the sidewalk next to a barrier. Another couple seemed ready to sleep as
well. They started to lie down, and as the police started talking, the rules
kept changing.
First, the police moved the street-side
barrier inward so that one of the legs wasn't "on the street." Then,
it was OK to sit up, but not lie down, on the sidewalk. Then, half the sidewalk
had to be open. Then, we had to be moving. A group of protestors walked back
and forth on the block, joking with the police about the ridiculous call with
lines like "I don't mean to be a stickler, officer, but they're not
moving" and "Officer! Officer! I can't walk!"
Next thing you know, white-shirted cops
were putting up barriers to block off Wall St. Officers were demanding people
show ID to enter the sidewalk. Then all entrances to Wall St. were blocked.
Suddenly, cops shouted "This is a frozen zone!" and we all had to
leave. Notably, amid all the overreaction from the police, there were only a
handful of demonstrators still pacing on the sidewalk.
After the spectacle, I drank a few cups
of water, ate some cookies, and chatted with some college kids who had
road-tripped all the way from North Carolina just to stay for the weekend.
Before going to sleep, I went to the McDonald's bathroom to pee.
Inside the restaurant (called,
ironically, the "people's McDonald's"), organizers and press utilized
the free wifi and pounded away at keyboards. In the bathroom, a girl charged
her phone; others were in their pajamas, waiting, like me, for one last, late-night
bathroom trip.
Back at camp, I was wide awake for
hours. People were skateboarding down the sidewalk, quietly strumming guitars,
discussing, debating, and arguing with the press for photographing people who
were asleep. It was not disturbingly loud, but just enough to keep my eyelids
forcing themselves open. When I finally did fall asleep, I slept hard.
I rolled over at the crack of dawn to
witness an ironic scene, blurry without my contacts, of suits surrounding the
park and walking to work. When I woke up again, it was to a mic-check
announcement that a girl was being arrested for writing on the sidewalk with
chalk.
Although it may appear chaotic to the
outside observer, the decision-making process in Liberty Plaza is incredibly
organized. The working groups are the subcultures of the larger movement, and
within them like-minded individuals share ideas and use their own particular
creativity.
The working groups ensure that no ideas
are lost, while the general assembly (GA) assures that none becomes tyrannical.
That all opinions are considered is perhaps the best rebuttal to offer people
who have yet to understand Occupy Wall St. If you are part of the 99 percent
exploited by corporations and their government, but dislike Occupy Wall St.,
don't write off the demonstrators; join them and ask questions---create your
own change.
Speaking for Occupy Wall St.'s
dedication to inclusiveness and tolerance is that anyone can form a working
group. To create one of these panels, designed for similarly knowledgeable or
passionate persons to share their insight and creativity, any individual may
announce at a general assembly that he or she would like to start a new group.
Once established, the group holds meetings, the time and place of which are
announced at the GA, and anyone is welcome to attend.
Working groups are free to act in
accordance with their own desires. They may problem-solve and ask for
additional help---the sanitation group, for example, often makes announcements
asking people to help clean up after themselves.
But should a working group wish to make
a suggestion that may reach beyond itself to affect the whole group, a
representative or facilitator, often someone who is either the most
knowledgeable or long-term member (and they shift) presents the idea at the
general assembly.
There, a vote determines whether the
initiative will go forward. GA facilitators represent a working group
themselves. Because they make sure the assemblies run smoothly, visitors may
perceive them to be in a leadership position. But it is the crowd, not the
speakers, who check egos and leaders to be sure the movement remains
egalitarian.
Because general assemblies gather
hoards of people, often hundreds, the human microphone technique is used to
amplify voices. Speakers announce part of a sentence, which is echoed by the
crowd in waves. The tediousness of the human-mic process works to check the
hardcore rhetoric itself: To deliver a point requires great effort and
patience. To speed along the process, however, hand signals are used in
communication. Circling---or rolling---your arms means "speed it up,"
and creating a diamond with your fingers suggests a problem with "point of
process."
This signal is used when someone's
announcement is off-topic or opinionated; at the GA, only factual information
is requested. Afterward, as GA facilitators often announce, there is time for
"soap box." Other hand signals communicate agreement, or lack
thereof.
Wiggling fingers pointed upward signal
"I like that" or "I'm feeling good" while fingers pointed
straight down mean the opposite. The need for more discussion or uncertainty is
expressed by fingers straight out in front.
One of the most beautiful elements of
the general assembly is "progressive stacking," a mechanism by which
facilitators remind speakers to encourage diversity.
While it can be a touchy subject,
progressive stacking asks white males to step down and realize that others have
been exploited or disenfranchised their whole lives. But the GAs and working
groups are not the only times ideas are expressed. All day in the park,
enthusiasts show up and exchange pertinent information. Some, like Naomi Klein,
Slavoj Zizek and Jeffrey Sachs have been more influential than others.
But aside from celebrity voices,
regular people continually express their opinions as well. Microphone checks
are conducted without planning, and with the voice of the crowd, one person can
easily share information. Incredibly, all of the ideas and voices are out in
the open---right there to be soaked in, exchanged and debated.
But as crowds gather in growing numbers
in Liberty Plaza, the visibility and egalitarianism of Occupy Wall St. is
challenged. Some working groups have moved off-site, not far, but a few blocks
away on Wall St. As organizer Scott Simpson, 22, said, "Some people
are worried that it raises visibility issues. Because it's not in the
park, it's more difficult for people to know when and where a meeting is being
held."
The influx of people at Liberty Plaza
has generated a few more concerns. The communal movement has attracted people
from all walks of life, and as people with personal issues and various types of
self-promoters squeeze in, the ecosystem shows some fragility.
There is always music and constant crowding,
with people bumping shoulders and stepping on toes every once in a while.
Usually, these kinds of exchanges actually end well. But sometimes, people
argue---rushing someone to hurry in line, demanding cigarettes, etc.
Typically the argugments occur between
some less understanding campers, and the crowd peacefully intervenes to
separate them and remind them why they are there. Organizers do not accept
belligerence. Not too long ago in Liberty Plaza, a long mic-checked
announcement declared "This is not a dive bar...This is not
Bonnaroo."
Yet the community has hung together
despite unavoidable pressures from the outside. Marginal personalities --
perhaps those with emotional issues or on drugs -- will inevitably turn up at a
space offering free food and mass camp-outs.
The presence of these types has the
potential to undermine the efforts of the whole, and can add tension to the
ability of organizers and activists trying to keep things running smoothly.
Checked behavior from the crowd is the most common response, but more advanced
responses are necessary for the drug-addicted population.
Pauly, a medic who did not wish to give
his last name, said: "Ninety-nine percent of the people are here for the
right reasons," but acknowledged the safety threat posed by drug use in
the park. He also said that organizers have identified a core group of drug
users and are formulating the best method to deal with them.
Pauly says medics will undergo training
to deal with overdoses, and New York City needle exchange groups will set up
nearby. The goal is not to punish or kick out drug addicts, but to treat their
disease. Still, after refusing methadone treatment, a handful of drug users
have been asked to leave. The problem is they keep coming back.
But, according to Pauly, "It is
going to work itself out very soon." The medical working group is focusing
on bringing in support from the community to work on solutions. Case and
social workers, he said, could be pulled in to help diffuse situations where
drug users refuse to leave by "giving them some logic." The issue, he
said, is the safety of the masses.
The issue of drug use also draws
attention to the potential for a shift in organization. While Pauly said more
organization and leadership may become crucial for safety reasons, Tim Weldon,
35, also predicts a change in organization.
Not one leader, but leadership in the
form of something like a council of the most knowledgeable, could "take
the most pronounced symptoms and express them more clearly in a systematic
manner," which would allow for "more coherence in ourselves,"
and the ability to "take more of a stance on specific situations."
It is important to remember that Occupy
Wall St. is a new movement. As ideas solidify and hardcore supporters stick around,
the information and message will become more concrete. But for now, organizers
are working on creating the movement, generating ideas and solidifying the
process capable of sparking vital change. (X)
Kristen
Gwynne is a freelance writer and an editorial assistant at AlterNet.org. This
article appears on Alternet and is reprinted here without permission.